Activity description

Conduct the debate using the following format:

Assign each group a role to defend:
  • Group A (Embrace): Argue that it is essential to embrace new ideas and be open-minded when confronted with conflicting information.
  • Group B (Challenge): Argue that it is natural to feel hesitant or resistant to accepting new ideas due to cognitive dissonance.

Provide real-life examples and scenarios for both sides to use during the debate. 


Embrace Side Examples:
"When scientific evidence challenges a long-held belief, it is crucial to embrace the new understanding and adapt our perspective."
"Exploring different cultures and traditions allows us to embrace diversity and broadens our worldview."

Challenge Side Examples:
"Facing cognitive dissonance can lead to critical examination of new ideas, ensuring we are not easily swayed by misleading information."
"Sometimes, clinging to our core values in the face of new ideas protects us from falling for misguided trends."

Conduct the debate in a structured format, including opening statements, rebuttals, and closing arguments. Encourage students to use evidence and reasoning to support their positions.

After the debate, facilitate a class discussion to debrief and reflect on the arguments presented. Encourage students to share their insights and consider the importance of cognitive flexibility and open-mindedness in learning and personal growth.
cookieCookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.